首頁核心理念團隊最新消息關於我們
最新消息
Facebook 社區動態

Did our ad say “poison children”? No. The English text says “negatively influence our children.”

Did our ad say “poison children”? No. The English text says “negatively influence our children.” Carol Day’s email described it as an accusation of poisoning. In this video, Sheldon explains why the Chinese phrase「荼毒」does not mean someone is literally poisoning children. Debate

Did our ad say “poison children”? No. The English text says “negatively influence our children.”

Facebook 雙語原文;保留發帖時的文字,未另作翻譯。

Did our ad say “poison children”? No. The English text says “negatively influence our children.”

Carol Day’s email described it as an accusation of poisoning. In this video, Sheldon explains why the Chinese phrase「荼毒」does not mean someone is literally poisoning children. Debate the message if you disagree with it, but represent what the ad actually says.

我們的廣告有沒有指控別人「向孩子下毒」?沒有。英文原文寫的是「negatively influence our children」,意思是對孩子造成負面影響。

Carol Day 在電郵中將廣告描述成指控別人「poison children」。Sheldon 在片中解釋,中文「荼毒」並非指真的向孩子下毒。可以不同意我們的教育立場,但請先準確引述廣告內容。

#AdvanceRichmond #RichmondBC #RichmondElection

來源:列治文前進 Facebook 社區動態。 在 Facebook 查看原帖

Newsletter · 電子報

掌握列治文的第一手社區動態

訂閱 ARCA 電子報,接收市政議題分析、活動邀請與行動快訊。

我們尊重您的隱私,隨時可以取消訂閱。